Disclosure: The views and opinions expressed herein belong solely to the authors and do not represent the views and opinions of crypto.news editorials.
As politicians, traditional financial institutions and Wall Street investors show increasing enthusiasm for cryptocurrencies, the market dynamics of an industry that has operated in its own nebulous niche for years has come under increased scrutiny.
summary
Cryptocurrency prices are a dangerously bad signal. Weak liquidity, wash trading, and insider adjustments routinely create false demand and turn charts into marketing tools rather than reflecting their actual utility and value. Without stabilizing forces, speculation replaces valuation. Unlike stocks, tokens lack fundamentals and institutional arbitrage, allowing momentum flywheels to drive prices to extremes, misleading investors and distorting developer and user behavior. This dynamic hinders mainstream adoption. Manipulation undermines trust, punishes new entrants, and prevents cryptocurrencies from becoming trusted infrastructure until liquidity, regulation, or new mechanisms anchor prices to reality.
Because crypto token prices are dramatically affected by momentum, crypto traders are obsessed with price charts and rely heavily on them when making trading decisions. Sudden price spikes are usually perceived as important market signals. This means that the protocol must gain momentum, the network must grow, and the tokens must have utility and intrinsic value.
But that mental shortcut has dangerous consequences. In fact, operators know how to successfully manipulate the system and make price charts look attractive. Most crypto tokens are thinly traded and their prices can be easily influenced by small demand. Market manipulation is rampant, misleading market making is rampant, and coordinated wash trading is rampant.
As cryptocurrencies become more mainstream, it is important to realize that the price of a token is not a proxy for value. In illiquid and speculative markets, short-term price actions can create the illusion of increasing utility, distorting valuations, misleading investors, and triggering feedback loops that destabilize networks.
If digital assets are to mature into investable and productive infrastructure, we need to confront how the liquidity gap fosters distortions and stop confusing volatility with value.
Valuing digital assets is inherently difficult
Unlike stocks, most tokens do not have valuation metrics such as earnings, cash flow, or dividend yield. There is no price/earnings ratio for reference. There is no discounted cash flow model to triangulate. As a result, price becomes the default signal, regardless of whether it has any basis in reality. This creates structural vulnerabilities in the recognition and pricing of digital assets.
Even in traditional markets, asset prices can deviate from fundamentals. However, in cryptocurrencies, the disconnect is exacerbated by a lack of market stabilization, low transparency, minimal regulation, and low liquidity.
Consider the case of Mantra and its OM token. As of March 2025, the token appeared to have strong fundamentals and extensive trading activity. For most traders, this token looked like an attractive investment. But behind the scenes, Mantra team members are said to have been working with market makers and community insiders to simulate bogus trading activity using a technique known as “wash trading.” OM tokens were exchanged between insiders, creating the illusion of strong demand and deep liquidity. This method intentionally designed indicators that analysts and investors rely on. On paper, the token appeared to be in the top 25 by market capitalization, but in reality less than 1% of the token supply was purely traded.
As this artificial trading volume drove up prices and attracted outside investors, insiders began selling off their holdings. Within 90 minutes, the value of the token plummeted by 90%. The people behind the scheme walked away with profits, but retail investors were left holding nearly worthless tokens.
These types of events are widespread across cryptocurrencies, preventing the industry from reaching a broader investor base. Who would want to enter such deceptive waters?
How market illiquidity and lack of stability disrupt price perception
In traditional markets, market capitalization is huge, and only the largest companies like Citadel can move the market meaningfully, making them the de facto gatekeepers of how assets are priced. These companies use fundamentals such as price-to-earnings ratio, free cash flow, and earnings growth to set their valuation criteria.
Their presence increases stability and keeps the market grounded in reality. When a stock’s P/E ratio gets too high, investors expect big funds to start cutting back on their positions and, in turn, their own. Valuations converge toward benchmarks set by the companies with the most market-moving power. And these institutions have historically kept valuations in check and steered retail sentiment in a rational direction, whether through self-fulfilling prophecy or informed analysis.
In contrast, crypto markets lack this stabilizing force. Instead, retail traders dominate the space, often chasing momentum without any basis in reality. They are not arbitrating towards fair value, they are purely speculating on what will happen next. A lack of institutional discipline creates room for maneuver. The lack of a shared valuation framework and thin liquidity makes it easy to fabricate misleading price signals and fool investors who are trained to read charts as accurately reflecting a company’s performance.
Cryptocurrency markets are often highly illiquid, further exacerbating the dysfunction. Outside of the top tokens (Bitcoin (BTC), Ethereum (ETH), Solana (SOL), etc.), most token markets are extremely illiquid, and even modest buy/sell (or sell) activity can cause prices to fluctuate dramatically.
In markets where price is the only proxy for value, investors commonly misinterpret manipulative buying as a genuine sign that the project is promising (“Why else would its value skyrocket?”). Tokens will be appreciated. Traders are interpreting this move as a sign of increased utility. And new investors keep coming in, reinforcing this trend. The buying itself drives prices even higher, justifying even more bullishness, creating a crazy flywheel that pushes valuations to irrational levels.
In a market disconnected from reality, everyone loses.
As cryptocurrencies teeter on the precipice of mainstream adoption, it remains unclear whether retail investors will step into a stable, realistic market or into chaos fueled by insider trading hype. The industry is in dire need of a stabilizing force, whether it be a predictable investment thesis, regulatory safeguards, or well-funded players clinging to new crypto-native solutions.
The industry’s current stance of aggressively inviting outside investment while actively punishing outside investors seems ridiculously unsustainable.
Newcomers to cryptocurrencies end up making bets based on misinterpreted signals. Cryptocurrency developers mistake high token prices as evidence of product market fit (“Investors must be reacting to our latest features!”) and derail development. And pragmatic users are forced to navigate volatile token prices, which can undermine the real usability of the asset in payments.
After a stellar year of regulatory victories, skyrocketing valuations, and a surge in capital inflows, the cryptocurrency industry is booming… but in order to reach its full potential, it needs to be brought back to reality.
