BAfter watching 100 minutes of Money Electric, I gained a deeper understanding of Bitcoin and blockchain technology. This is quite an achievement, especially since I just started exploring apps for 2021. Although I can’t fully articulate my newfound knowledge of digital currencies, I assure you it’s heartfelt.
Money Electric presents a rich array of visuals aimed at demystifying complex concepts, making it accessible even for those who usually shy away from crypto discussions. While this is beneficial, my grasp of blockchain, its components, coins, and keys, still feels somewhat limited.
There’s much more than just graphics at play. Created by seasoned documentary filmmakers, this work is engaging and thought-provoking, driven by the vision of Karen Hoback. The film not only unpacks how Bitcoin functions but also explores its significance, its implications for individuals and society, and the nature of money itself. It tackles questions surrounding the management of Bitcoin and the motivations behind its decentralization, the implications of maintaining the anonymity of transactions traditionally associated with cash, civil liberties issues, and the ongoing struggle for the U.S. to maintain its status as the world’s reserve currency.
Amidst all these compelling topics lies a question that might intrigue viewers less than those passionate about the subject: the true identity of Satoshi Nakamoto.
The mysterious figure behind Bitcoin, who has yet to be definitively identified, published a groundbreaking white paper in 2008 titled “Bitcoin: A Peer-to-Peer Electronic Cash System.” The following year, Nakamoto unveiled the blockchain software and the first Bitcoin batch, known as the Genesis Block, before vanishing after transferring control to others while reportedly holding on to around a million Bitcoin. This untouched stash remains part of the blockchain’s history.
If Nakamoto ever decided to cash out, they would likely become the wealthiest person on the planet, unless they’ve purposely discarded the access keys to their fortune.
A significant portion of Money Electric is devoted to uncovering Nakamoto’s identity through interviews and investigations involving notable individuals, including British cryptography expert Adam Back. The documentary encapsulates the confused atmosphere surrounding this quest, drawing attention to the early adopters and the competitive landscape of Bitcoin’s development. While the film touches on theories about ancient forum posts related to Nakamoto, these elements sometimes make the narrative feel fragmented. Ultimately, it culminates in a gathering of suspects where Hoback presents the findings, resembling an Agatha Christie mystery more than a conclusive solution.
While some complex themes and philosophical inquiries are somewhat neglected in favor of the mystery, the film follows the lead of El Salvador and features Samson Mo, dubbed the “Bitcoin Ambassador,” as he endeavors to persuade countries, particularly those with adverse relations to the U.S., to embrace Bitcoin as their main currency. Various Bitcoin experiments are showcased, highlighting the potential for the U.S. to respond by either restricting such developments or launching its own digital currency.
However, the documentary doesn’t fully explore what might transpire if either side prevails, leaving Hoback’s deep dive into Nakamoto’s work feeling like a missed opportunity, filled with intriguing research but lacking narrative cohesion.
Money Electric: The Bitcoin Mystery is currently airing on Sky Documentaries, available for viewing now.