WASHINGTON – The Supreme Court on Friday left the District of Columbia with years of gun restrictions, banning magazines that hold more than 10 rounds of ammunition, and again chose not to file a new gun rights lawsuit.
The court, which generally has a 6-3 conservative majority in favour of gun rights, challenged Washington, D.C. just days after refusing to appeal against similar Rhode Island laws.
The court then also left the ban on assault-style weapons in Maryland, including the AR-15 semi-automatic rifle.
Follow the live politics report here
The court expanded gun rights in a major ruling in 2022, when it first discovered that arms rights extended outside the home under the second amendment of the Constitution. However, the court has annoyed gun owners by refusing to litigate efforts to expand its ruling.
The District of Columbia has long been a legal battlefield over gun restrictions. The 2008 Supreme Court landmark found its first discovery at home that individuals have the right to burden weapons in their own defense.
In the most recent case, four gun owners challenged the high-capacity magazine restrictions enacted in the aftermath of the 2008 Supreme Court ruling, saying the restrictions were illegal under the 2022 decision.
Both federal judges and the U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld the law.
The Court of Appeals said in last year’s ruling that large-capacity magazines are second amendment weapons, which have been common for many years, but can be regulated because they are “particularly dangerous.”
Last summer, the Supreme Court shunned multiple gun-related disputes shortly after it issued a ruling in favour of federal law that prohibits people subject to domestic violence control orders from possessing firearms.
In other pending appeal lawsuits Friday, the court decided to file a key election lawsuit, including mail-in voting on the Pennsylvania battlefield that fought Republicans against Democrats.
The decision will result in the Pennsylvania Supreme Court ruling that voters who send mail-in ballots flagged as defective can submit separate provisions for individual votes.
The Republican National Committee was trying to overturn the 2024 state court ruling while the Democratic National Committee defended it.
